Paul Almeida el 18/05/2022 a las 12:17 Requires logic and ‘open to being wrong-ness’ Accede para responder
Дима М el 18/05/2022 a las 12:17 The most common cult in exercise is the cult of «full ROM» ,while people from this cult usually like to use expressions like «science has proven it» Accede para responder
Steve Thomas el 18/05/2022 a las 12:17 Lack of understanding science strikes again lol Accede para responder
Darren el 18/05/2022 a las 12:17 For years I clung to the 8-12 method for hypertrophy, been getting much better results from 16-20ish Accede para responder
S H E O N A G O L D E N #thisis40 el 18/05/2022 a las 12:17 This is the beauty of research. It is constantly growing and evolving; which is what we are meant to do as well 🙌 Accede para responder
Josh Spivey el 18/05/2022 a las 12:17 I train the way I do primarily because I enjoy it and get excited to hit the gym. Consistency is #1 and getting there is different for everything Accede para responder
rich tucker el 18/05/2022 a las 12:17 But it seems that every time a research study proves a principle, you can find another that refutes it. “Science based” training doesn’t remotely seem to be clear cut. Accede para responder
Requires logic and ‘open to being wrong-ness’
One of us, one of us
The most common cult in exercise is the cult of «full ROM» ,while people from this cult usually like to use expressions like «science has proven it»
✔️✔️✔️
All. The. Time. PREACH! 🙌
Beautiful !!!!!!
Preach 🙌
Lack of understanding science strikes again lol
Beautiful 🙌
Very true 👍
For years I clung to the 8-12 method for hypertrophy, been getting much better results from 16-20ish
This is the beauty of research. It is constantly growing and evolving; which is what we are meant to do as well 🙌
Yes🔥
always a student. always learning🙌
Yes yes and yes 👏
💰
A much needed one
So rigth. 👏👏👏
I train the way I do primarily because I enjoy it and get excited to hit the gym. Consistency is #1 and getting there is different for everything
But it seems that every time a research study proves a principle, you can find another that refutes it. “Science based” training doesn’t remotely seem to be clear cut.